This section presents a variety of problems, utilizing ideas and techniques covered in:
EXAMPLE:
Suppose the population of a city was $\,680{,}000\,$ in $\,1992\,$;
the relative growth rate is $\,12\%\,$ per year.
What is the population $\,t\,$ years after $\,1992\,$? In the year $\,2000\,$?
Let $\,t = 0\,$ in $\,1992\,$, and measure $\,t\,$ in years.  Choose $\,t = 0\,$. Here, the year corresponding to the earliest known population size is chosen. Since the given relative growth rate is ‘$\,12\%\,$ per year’, you need to use units of ‘year’ for time when using the model $\,P(t) = P_{\,0}{\text{e}}^{rt}\,$. 
Let $\,P(t)\,$ have units of thousands. For example, $\,P(t) = 680\,$ means that the population at time $\,t\,$ is $\,680{,}000\,$. 
Choose the units for the output. By using units of thousands, you can work with smaller numbers. 
Let $\,P(t) = P_{\,0}{\text{e}}^{rt}\,$, where:

Whenever you see the phrase relative growth rate, continuous growth rate,
or exponential growth rate, you know you're dealing with exponential behavior. As discussed in Exponential Growth and Decay: Introduction, all exponential growth/decay problems can be modeled using $\,P(t) = P_{\,0}{\text{e}}^{rt}\,$, where $\,r\,$ is the relative growth rate. 
The year $\,2000\,$ corresponds to: $P(8) = 680{\text{e}}^{(0.12)(8)} \approx 1775.954\,$ In the year $\,2000\,$, the population will be about $\,1{,}775{,}954\,$ people. 
Be careful with units! Here, $\,P(8) \approx 1775.954\,$ has units of thousands. Thus, the output of $\,1775.954\,$ from the function $\,P\,$ corresponds to a population of $\,(1775.954)(1000) = 1{,}775{,}954\,$. 
EXAMPLE:
Suppose the population of a city was $\,680{,}000\,$ in $\,1992\,$;
it is growing at the rate of $\,12\%\,$ per year.
What is the population $\,t\,$ years after $\,1992\,$? In the year $\,2000\,$?
Let $\,t = 0\,$ in $\,1992\,$, and measure $\,t\,$ in years.  Choose $\,t = 0\,$ and units for the input. 
Let $\,P(t)\,$ have units of thousands.  Choose the units for the output. 
Recognize exponential growth: equal changes in the input (every year) cause the output to be multiplied by a constant ($\,1.12\,$). Let $\,P(t) = P_{\,0}{\text{e}}^{rt}\,$, where:

After one year, the population is $\,P_{\,0} + (12\%)(P_{\,0}) = 1\,P_{\,0} + (0.12)(P_{\,0}) = 1.12P_{\,0}\,$. A growth rate of $\,12\%\,$ per year corresponds to a yearly multiplier of $\,1.12\,$. Once exponential behavior has been identified, you can always use the model $\,P(t) = P_{\,0}{\text{e}}^{rt}\,$. However, it is not always easiest. Exponential behavior is defined by equal changes in the input causing the output to be multiplied by a constant. Whenever an (equal change,constant multiplier) pair is known then there is a more natural exponential model to use, as shown below. 
Use $\,P(1) = (1.12)P_{\,0}\,$ to solve for $\,r\,$: $\overbrace{P_{\,0}\,{\text{e}}^{r\cdot 1}}^{P(1)} = 1.12P_{\,0}$ ${\text{e}}^r = 1.12$ (divide by $\,P_{\,0}\,$) $r = \ln 1.12$ Thus: $\,P(t) = 680{\text{e}}^{t\ln 1.12}\,$ $\,P(8) = 680{\text{e}}^{8\cdot \ln 1.12} \approx 1683.655\,$ In the year $\,2000\,$, the population will be about $\,1{,}683{,}655\,$ people. (An annual growth rate of $\,12\%\,$ is slightly slower than a relative growth rate of $\,12\%\,$.) 
Notice that an annual growth rate of $\,12\% = 0.12\,$ corresponds to a relative growth rate of $\,\ln 1.12 \approx 0.1133 = 11.33\%\,$. Similarly, an annual growth rate of $\,g\,$ corresponds to a relative growth rate of $\,\ln(1 + g)\,$. The graph below shows the annual growth rate in blue, and the relative growth rate in red. For growth rates up to about $\,5\%\,$ they are almost indistinguishable. $\,y = g\,$ (blue) $\,y = \ln (1 + g)\,$ (red) 
Let $\,t = 0\,$ in $\,1992\,$, and measure $\,t\,$ in years. Let $\,P(t)\,$ have units of thousands. Then: $\,P(t) = 680(1.12)^t\,$ $\,P(8) = 680(1.12)^8 \approx 1683.655\,$ (Of course, this is the same answer as above!) Much easier! 
Looking at a few years of population, a pattern quickly emerges:
So, even though you always have the option of using the exponential model $\,P(t) = P_{\,0}{\text{e}}^{rt}\,$, it is not always in your best interest to do so! 
Different choices (for time zero, for input/output units) will cause the solutions steps to look different.
As long as you're consistent with your choices, though, you'll always end up at exactly the same place!
To illustrate, here are a couple more ways of doing the previous problem.
These are not recommended choices—they just illustrate possibilities.
The problem is repeated here for your convenience:
Let $\,t = 0\,$ in $\,2000\,$, and measure $\,t\,$ in years. Let $\,P(t) = P_{\,0}{\text{e}}^{rt}\,$; both $\,P_{\,0}\,$ and $\,r\,$ must be found. Since $P(1) = (1.12)P(0)$: $$ \begin{gather} P_{\,0}{\text{e}}^r = (1.12)P_{\,0}\cr \,r = \ln (1.12) \end{gather} $$ Since $P(8) = 680{,}000\,$: $$ \begin{gather} P_{\,0}{\text{e}}^{8\ln(1.12)} = 680{,}000\cr\cr P_{\,0} = \frac{680{,}000}{{\text{e}}^{8\ln(1.12)}} = \frac{680{,}000}{1.12^{8}} = 680{,}000(1.12)^8 \approx 1{,}683{,}655 \end{gather} $$ Note that $\,P_{\,0}\,$ is the population in the year $\,2000\,$. The population $\,t\,$ years after $\,1992\,$ (which is $\,t8\,$ years after $\,2000\,$) is: $$P(t8) = 1{,}683{,}655{\text{e}}^{(t8)\ln(1.12)}$$ These are certainly not good choices to make for this problem! 
Let $\,t = 0\,$ in $\,1992\,$, and measure $\,t\,$ in weeks. Let $\,P(t)\,$ have units of hundredthousands. Then $\,P(t) = 6.8{\text{e}}^{rt}\,$; $\,r\,$ must be found. Since $P(52) = (1.12)P(0)$: $$ \begin{gather} P_{\,0}{\text{e}}^{52r} = (1.12)P_{\,0}\cr 52r = \ln (1.12)\cr r = \frac{\ln(1.12)}{52} \end{gather} $$ So, $$P(t) = 6.8{\text{e}}^{t\ln(1.12)/52}$$ Finally, $$ P(8\cdot 52) = 6.8{\text{e}}^{8\cdot 52\cdot \ln(1.12)/52} \approx 16.83655 $$ Therefore, the population in the year $\,2000\,$ is: $$(16.83655)(100{,}000) = 1{,}683{,}655$$ 
Exponential behavior is defined by equal changes in the input
causing the output to
be multiplied by a constant.
Whenever an (equal change,constant multiplier) pair is known
then there is a natural exponential model to use, as discussed next.
Suppose that a time change of $\,\Delta t\,$ (read as ‘delta $\,t\,$’)
causes the output to successively be multiplied by a constant $\,b\,$.
Thus, we are considering the (equal change,constant multiplier) pair to be $\,(\Delta t,b)\,$.
Letting $\,P_{\,0}\,$ denote the starting amount and $\,P(t)\,$ the amount at time $\,t\,$, a pattern quickly emerges:
starting amount; amount at $\,t = 0$  $P(0) = P_{\,0} = P_{\,0}b^0$  
amount at time $\Delta t$ (one time period elapses)  prior amount gets multiplied by $\,b\,$  $P(\Delta t) = b\cdot P_{\,0}b^0 = P_{\,0}b^1$ 
amount at time $2\Delta t$ (another time period elapses)  prior amount gets multiplied by $\,b\,$  $P(2\Delta t) = b\cdot P_{\,0}b^1 = P_{\,0}b^2$ 
amount at time $3\Delta t$ (another time period elapses)  prior amount gets multiplied by $\,b\,$  $P(3\Delta t) = b\cdot P_{\,0}b^1 = P_{\,0}b^3$ 
In general, we have $\,P(k\Delta t) = P_{\,0}b^{k}\,$.
But, what is the amount at an arbitrary time $\,t\,$?
Let $\,t = k\Delta t\,$, so that $k = t/\Delta t\,$.
Then we have:
Here are examples:
Note: An (equal change,constant multiplier) pair is not unique!
If $\,(\Delta t,b)\,$ is such a pair, then so is $\displaystyle\,(k\Delta t,b^k)\,$ for every nonzero real number $\,k\,$, since
$$
P(t) = P_{\,0}(b^k)^{\frac{t}{k\Delta t}} = P_{\,0}b^{k\,\cdot\,\frac{t}{k\Delta t}} = P_{\,0}b^{t/\Delta t}
$$
On this exercise, you will not key in your answer. However, you can check to see if your answer is correct. 
PROBLEM TYPES:
