Is there an "SSA" Congruence Theorem? NO!

Due to math content, this page has special requirements (including JavaScript) for full functionality.
With your current viewing scenario, it is not appearing and behaving as it is supposed to!
Please visit Dr. Carol J.V. Fisher's Homepage to learn what this site has to offer.
Watch the "Welcome" video to get started—hope to see you back here soon!

Dr. Carol J.V. Fisher's Homepage

For this exercise, you need ♥ INTERNET EXPLORER 6.0 and above, with MathPlayer installed.♥

IS THERE AN "SSA" CONGRUENCE THEOREM? NO!

Jump right to the exercises!

So far, we have four theorems that give conditions under which two triangles are guaranteed to be congruent:

Knowing two angles in a triangle uniquely determines the third angle,
and hence the shape of the triangle.
Then, knowing the length of one side specifies the size of the triangle.
These observations lead to the ASA (an included side)
and AAS (a non-included side) congruence theorems.
Imagine two boards of fixed length, attached with a hinge.
Opening the hinge a specified amount uniquely determines a triangle.
This leads to the SAS congruence theorem.
As long as the third side has length less than the sum of the hinged sides (and also isn't too short),
then the hinge can be opened just enough to attach the third board.
This observation leads to the SSS congruence theorem.

A natural question then arises: is there an "SSA" congruence theorem?
That is, if you know two sides and a non-included angle, is a unique triangle determined?
The discussion below shows that the general answer is "no":
however, there are special cases where, with a bit more information, a unique triangle is determined.

Pick a point on a dashed line (see diagrams below) and attach a side of a specified length at a specified angle.
A second side will be attached to the first.
Observe that this configuration gives two sides and a non-included angle.
Depending on the length of the second side relative to the first, different things can happen, as discussed below.

If the second side is too short, then it will just wave around in the air.
No matter what angle it is attached at, it will never be long enough to reach the dashed line and form a triangle.
In this situation, there does not exist a triangle with the given two sides and non-included angle.

If the second side is just the right length,
then it will hit the dashed line at a single point.
In this case, a unique right triangle is determined.
One of the known sides is the hypotenuse;
the other side is one of the legs.

With a slightly different approach, suppose you know the hypotenuse and one of the legs in a right triangle.
Using the Pythagorean Theorem, the third side is then uniquely determined.

These observations give the following:
HL (Hypotenuse Leg) Congruence Theorem
A unique triangle is formed by knowing the hypotenuse and one leg in a right triangle.
Thus, if two right triangles have the same lengths for the hypotenuse and one leg,
then the triangles are congruent.

This next case is the reason there is no "SSA" congruence theorem.
If you make the second side even longer, then two different triangles can be formed.
That is, ΔABD and ΔABC satisfy the "SSA" condition:
two sides and a non-included angle are the same.
However, they are not congruent.

There's a common memory device to avoid this tempting "SSA" situation;
it comes from noticing that reading "SSA" backwards gives the name of a donkey.
Don't be a "backwards SSA" and think that there's an "SSA" congruence!

If the length of the second side is exactly the same as the first side,
then a (unique) isosceles triangle is formed.

Recall that an isosceles triangle is a triangle that has at least two sides of equal length.

To complete the argument, make the second side longer than the first side.
Again, a unique triangle is formed.

On this exercise, you will not key in your answer.
However, you can check to see if your answer is correct.